Fostering cultures of open qualitative research
A recently completed project (running January to July 2023) examining practical and epistemic barriers to open qualitative research. The project was funded internally by University of 91̀½»¨ with Research England monies as part of their 2022-2023 ‘Enhancing Research Cultures’ programme.
About the project
Normative scientific notions of reproducibility and replicability are well established as mainstays for assessing and/or evaluating research. As a result, cultures of making quantitative datasets openly available, and for making the analytical processes and methods used to generate them transparent have become standard expectations of good research.
On the other hand, qualitative research, often steeped in interpretivism, has seen far less importance placed on reproducibility. Methods such as ethnographic immersion are seen to negate the process, small sample sizes can make anonymity problematic, meanwhile, personal interactions in interviews or focus groups can differ from one day to the next depending on the dynamics of that interaction, the mood of a participant or researcher, and on when and/or where the interaction takes place. Meanwhile, funders, regulators, and national bodies are currently moving towards an expectation that research of all types be made open access.
Working to address the latter, this project received £13,913.85 from Research England monies as part of Research England's '' scheme to examine: (1) how a culture of open qualitative research might be fostered; and (2) to report on what resources are needed to support it. The ran from January to July 2023, addressing questions about the perceptions and existing practices of open qualitative research - including making qualitative data and analyses open access, and in working in more open and transparent ways. Rather than focussing only on technical and processual aspects, the project also covered epistemic discussion i.e., what it means to make interpretivist inquiry open at various stages, and on how we might move towards open qualitative research whilst acknowledging a diverse array of underlying bases.
For empirics, the project drew on a survey with 91 respondents, fifteen semi-structured interviews, and a stakeholder workshop with experts to assess and feedback on the analysis. All datasets are available on an open access (CC-BY-NC license) basis as below:
- Hanchard M and San Roman Pineda I (2023) Fostering cultures of open qualitative research: Dataset 1 – Survey Responses. 91̀½»¨. DOI:
- Hanchard M and San Roman Pineda I (2023) Fostering cultures of open qualitative research: Dataset 2 – Interview Transcripts. 91̀½»¨. DOI:
- Hanchard M and San Roman Pineda I (2023) Fostering cultures of open qualitative research: Dataset 3 – Workshop Transcript. 91̀½»¨. DOI:
The final project report is available as below, providing various recommendations:
- Hanchard, M, & San Roman Pineda, I. (2023) Project Report: Fostering Cultures of Open Qualitative Research [Report] 91̀½»¨: 91̀½»¨. DOI:
The key finding from the research saw us introduce the notion of 're-renderability' in place or reproducibility or replicability, a key challenge to the notion of FAIR principles and a concept we plan to extend further into a peer-reviewed article soon. The concept has also been presented through a theoretical framing steeped in science and technology studies (STS) by Matthew Hanchard at the University of 91̀½»¨ Annual Open Research lecture 2023 - a recording of which is accessible as:
- Hanchard, M. (2023). Annual Open Research Lecture 2023: Dr Matthew Hanchard, Qualitative research: Towards a new socio-technical imaginary of open research. 91̀½»¨. Media.
About the team
- Itzel San Roman Pineda
iHuman
How we understand being ‘human’ differs between disciplines and has changed radically over time. We are living in an age marked by rapid growth in knowledge about the human body and brain, and new technologies with the potential to change them.